What are the best alternatives to Azure? That’s a question lots of people are asking and our team at Runpod set out to help answer. Microsoft Azure is one of the most feature-rich cloud platforms, offering everything from virtual machines and databases to advanced AI services.

Azure even provides access to high-end GPUs for training AI models and services like Azure Machine Learning for streamlined model development.

However, despite Azure’s capabilities, many startups and AI/ML teams are exploring Azure alternatives. Why are teams looking beyond Azure for Alternatives?

Cost is a major factor – Azure’s pricing, especially for GPU instances, can strain a startup’s budget. Some teams also need a specialized AI infrastructure not always available or optimal on Azure’s general-purpose cloud (such as the latest GPU models, AI-tailored workflows, or certain regional access).

In this article, we’ll highlight 8 top alternatives to Azure in 2025 that offer cost-effective, GPU-rich cloud solutions.

We’ll start with key criteria to evaluate an Azure alternative, then delve into the strengths and weaknesses of each provider.

Key Criteria To Evaluate An Azure Alternative

With these criteria in mind, let’s examine the top 10 Azure alternatives for 2025, how they stack up, and what unique value they bring for AI/ML-focused teams.

1. Pricing & Flexibility – Look for transparent pay‑as‑you‑go pricing with flexible billing (per‑second or per‑minute) and generous free tiers or startup credits.
2. GPU Availability & Performance – Ensure access to modern GPUs (like NVIDIA A100, H100, or AMD MI250/300X) in sufficient quantities and the ability to scale out multi‑GPU clusters or use specialized AI chips.
3. AI/ML Tooling & Framework Support – Evaluate built‑in support for managed ML platforms, one‑click model deployment, Jupyter integrations, and popular AI libraries.
4. Ease of Use & Developer Experience – Seek an intuitive UI/UX, robust CLI/API, pre‑configured environments, and community templates to streamline development.
5. Scalability & Infrastructure Options – Confirm the platform can scale vertically and horizontally, offering options like bare‑metal servers or serverless functions.
6. Regional Availability & Data Governance – Check data center locations and compliance with local data sovereignty to reduce latency.
7. Startup Support & Credits – Favor providers with startup programs that offer free credits, steep discounts, or hands‑on support.
8. Ecosystem & Integrations – Ensure a broad service ecosystem that integrates seamlessly with tools like Docker, Kubernetes, and CI/CD pipelines.
9. Support & Community – Look for reliable 24/7 support, active user communities, and comprehensive documentation for troubleshooting.

Best Azure Alternatives We Found

1. Runpod.io - Best Overall!

Runpod.io is a specialty cloud built for AI/ML practitioners seeking affordable, on-demand GPU power.

It’s best for startups and research teams running heavy GPU workloads (like deep learning model training or large-scale inference) without the overhead of managing complex cloud infrastructure.

If you’re training models like Stable Diffusion, GPT-style transformers, or running Jupyter notebooks on powerful GPUs, Runpod excels.

It’s also ideal for handling bursty AI jobs – you can spin up GPUs when needed and spin them down to save costs.

In short, Runpod is a top choice for those who want straightforward, cost-efficient GPU computing with minimal DevOps effort, making advanced AI infrastructure accessible to small teams and individuals.

Runpod.io Key Features:

• Wide Range of GPUs: Runpod offers cutting-edge GPUs including NVIDIA A100 and H100 Tensor Cores, as well as AMD Instinct MI250/MI300X accelerators.
• Pay-by-the-Second & No Hidden Fees: All GPU instances are billed by the minute (down to the second). There are no ingress/egress bandwidth fees​.
• Serverless GPU Endpoints: A standout feature is Runpod’s serverless GPU offering which is best in case you’re deploying or creating an AI app.
• Bring Your Own Container” Flexibility: Runpod lets you deploy any Docker container to their cloud​.
• Fast Setup & Dev-Friendly Tools: The platform is designed for ease of use – from a clean web UI to an easy CLI that can live-sync code from your local machine to the cloud​.
• Multi-Region Availability: Despite being a newer player, Runpod has a growing global presence. It boasts thousands of GPUs across 30+ regions (including North America, Europe, and Asia)​.

Runpod.io Limitations:

1. Lacks ancillary services like managed databases, IoT hubs, or big data solutions.
2. Being a relatively young service (founded in 2022), it may not meet the mature support needs of very large enterprises.
3. Its niche focus on GPU compute means reliance on other providers for complementary non‑ML workloads.

Runpod.io Pricing:

1. Straightforward pay‑as‑you‑go model, with an NVIDIA H100 80GB instance priced at around $2.60/hour or lower.
2. Two tiers available—Secure Cloud and Community Cloud—offering further cost savings through flexible billing.

2. Amazon Web Services (AWS)

‍Via AWS

Amazon Web Services is an Azure alternative which shines bright for startups and enterprises alike who want massive scalability and a vast ecosystem of tools.

It’s best for use cases where you not only require GPU instances for AI, but also need robust supporting services: think of an AI-driven web application that might also use AWS’s databases, serverless functions, and analytics.

AWS is also a leader in cutting-edge AI hardware; it’s ideal for those who need access to the latest GPUs (NVIDIA A100, H100) or custom AI chips like AWS Trainium and Inferentia for cost-effective model training and inference.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Key Features:

• AWS has the widest array of GPU instance types in the industry.
• SageMaker is AWS’s fully managed machine learning suite, providing managed Jupyter notebooks, automated model training, one-click deployment endpoints, and even a built-in model registry.
• For AI applications, you have fully managed databases (RDS, DynamoDB), data lakes (S3), analytics (Redshift, Athena), and event-driven compute (Lambda).
• For startups in regulated industries (health, finance), AWS can simplify meeting compliance requirements. Tools like AWS CloudTrail and CloudWatch provide extensive monitoring and logging for governance.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Limitations:

1. AWS’s vast array of services creates a steep learning curve—configuring EC2 GPU instances with the right VPC, security groups, and IAM roles can be overwhelming.
2. Its multi‑dimensional pricing model (compute, storage, bandwidth, etc.) often leads to unexpectedly high costs without vigilant monitoring and management.

AWS Pricing:

1. AWS employs a pay‑as‑you‑go model with options for savings plans or reserved instances to lower long‑term costs.
2. High‑end GPU rates are significant—for example, an NVIDIA H100 8‑GPU (p5 instance) costs around $96/hour on‑demand.
3. While AWS offers a 12‑month free tier for CPU instances and storage, free GPU hours are not included, though AWS Activate credits can help eligible startups.

3. Google Cloud Platform (GCP)

‍Via Google Cloud Platform

Google Cloud Platform is an excellent Azure alternative for teams that prioritize data analytics, machine learning, and a developer-friendly experience.

GCP is often chosen for its strong AI toolkit and relatively straightforward interface. It’s best for use cases like training ML models using TensorFlow, leveraging TPUs (Tensor Processing Units) for deep learning (hardware unique to Google Cloud), or building data pipelines that feed machine learning models.

Google Cloud Platform (GCP) Key Features:

• GCP offers Vertex AI, with Vertex AI, you can do AutoML (Google’s renowned automated model generation), use pre-trained APIs (for vision, speech, NLP, etc.), and deploy models with one click.
• Google Cloud offers TPUs (Tensor Processing Units), which are Google’s custom AI chips designed to accelerate training of neural networks.
• TPU v4 pods are among the fastest training infrastructure in the world for large language models.
• Competitive GPU Offerings & Preemptible Instances: GCP of course also offers NVIDIA GPUs (K80, T4, V100, A100, H100, etc.) in its Compute Engine.
• **Google Kubernetes Engine (**GKE) provides an easy path. It seamlessly supports GPU nodes, meaning you can run a Kubernetes cluster with GPU-powered pods for model inference.
• New customers get a $300 credit to spend in 90 days, and there’s a free tier for popular services.

Google Cloud Platform (GCP) Limitations:

1. Offers a narrower scope compared to AWS/Azure—with fewer enterprise SaaS integrations and third‑party marketplace images, and occasional deprecation of niche services ("Google Graveyard" effect).
2. Enterprise support can be challenging; quick, human support or higher quotas often require navigating account reps, which may not suit small startups.

Google Cloud Platform (GCP) Pricing:

1. Utilizes a simpler pricing model with automatic sustained‑use discounts and committed‑use contracts, though on‑demand GPU rates (e.g. ~$3.67/hr for an A100 40GB) can be high unless optimized with Spot VMs.

4. DigitalOcean

‍Via DigitalOcean

DigitalOcean is the go-to Azure alternative for startups and developers who want simplicity and predictable costs.

It’s best for small to mid-sized applications, dev/test environments, and recently, entry-level AI/ML workloads.

DigitalOcean has long been favored for web apps, SaaS products, and services that don’t require the huge array of features of an AWS/Azure – it covers the basics very well.

For AI teams, DigitalOcean’s new GPU offerings make it a contender for running machine learning inference or modest training jobs, especially if you need a straightforward experience.

DigitalOcean Key Features:

1. Extremely simple, developer-friendly interface that lets you spin up Droplets in seconds with a clean, straightforward UI.
2. Managed services for Kubernetes, databases, object storage, and load balancers, all designed for ease of use.
3. Recently introduced GPU Droplets and 1‑Click AI Models (in partnership with Hugging Face) for quick deployment of AI workloads.
4. Transparent, flat pricing with fixed rates and generous included bandwidth, avoiding unexpected charges.
5. Global data centers across multiple regions and a Hatch Startup Program offering significant cloud credits for early-stage companies.

DigitalOcean Limitations:

1. Lacks the extensive suite of specialized services like IoT hubs, advanced analytics, or enterprise integration tools compared to bigger clouds.
2. Its AI tooling is basic; managed AI services such as Azure Cognitive Services are not available, requiring manual setup for complex tasks.
3. Best suited for small to medium deployments—large-scale enterprises may find limitations in instance sizes and premium support options.

DigitalOcean Pricing:

1. Droplet plans are predictably priced; for example, a 2‑vCPU/4GB Droplet costs around $24/month with generous bandwidth included.
2. GPU Droplets start at approximately $2.99/hour for an 8GB NVIDIA A100, and new users receive a $200 credit for 60 days along with Hatch program benefits.

5. IBM Cloud

‍Via IBM Cloud

If you are in need of hybrid cloud solutions, strong legacy system integration, and specialized enterprise AI services, IBM Cloud is for you.

It’s best for scenarios where a startup or team is working with clients in highly regulated industries (finance, healthcare) that trust IBM, or when an application needs to integrate with on-premises mainframes or IBM Power Systems.

IBM Cloud shines in hybrid and multi-cloud deployments – if you want to use multiple clouds including on-prem, IBM’s OpenShift-based approach can be very appealing.

IBM Cloud Key Features:

1. Offers a robust suite of AI services through Watson Studio, Watson Machine Learning, and various Watson APIs for NLP, vision, and speech.
2. Provides hybrid cloud capabilities with deep integration of Red Hat OpenShift and IBM Cloud Satellite for consistent on‑prem and cloud environments.
3. Unique hardware options available include IBM Power Systems, IBM Z mainframes, and access to quantum computing via IBM Quantum.
4. Delivers enterprise‑grade support and high‑availability SLAs (up to 99.99%), with strong customer satisfaction and trusted global services.
5. Emphasizes top‑notch security with features like KYOK encryption and comprehensive compliance certifications for sensitive data.

IBM Cloud Limitations:

1. Perceived as tailored for large enterprises, which may deter general developers due to its enterprise‑oriented culture.
2. The IBM Cloud portal and service selection are sometimes viewed as less intuitive and less exhaustive compared to competitors like Azure.
3. Global data center coverage is smaller, potentially limiting options for low‑latency deployments outside major regions.

IBM Cloud Pricing:

1. Offers competitive, transparent pricing with free “Lite” tiers for many services and $200 credit for new accounts.
2. Bare‑metal server pricing and bundled enterprise packages can provide cost advantages, although VM spot pricing options are limited.

6. OVHcloud

‍Via OVHcloud

Another great azure alternative is OVHcloud which is for those looking for a European-based, budget-friendly cloud that offers both cloud instances and powerful bare-metal servers.

It’s best for startups or projects that need data residency in Europe (GDPR compliance) and want to take advantage of OVH’s often lower prices and ample resources.

OVHcloud is a great fit for workloads like game servers, large batch data processing, or hosting websites/API backends, where raw performance per dollar is key.

For AI teams, OVHcloud provides GPU servers and instances which can be useful for training models at a lower cost than Azure’s GPU VMs.

OVHcloud Key Features:

1. Offers affordable, high‑performance hardware through bare‑metal dedicated servers and cloud instances with GPU options (e.g. up to 4× V100 GPUs).
2. Operates European data centers ensuring strict GDPR compliance and avoiding U.S. CLOUD Act implications, ideal for government and healthcare projects.
3. Built on OpenStack, providing familiar APIs (including Terraform) that reduce vendor lock‑in.
4. Provides transparent, flat pricing with generous, often unmetered, bandwidth and included anti‑DDoS protection.
5. Enables architectural flexibility by mixing cloud and bare‑metal solutions, plus supports startups with credits and mentorship programs.

OVHcloud Limitations:

1. Lacks the extensive range of specialized services (e.g. IoT hubs, advanced analytics) found in larger clouds like Azure.
2. User experience can be inconsistent, with reports of a slow dashboard and sub‑par support responsiveness.
3. Global data center presence is more limited compared to Azure, focusing mainly on Europe, Canada, and select APAC regions.

OVHcloud Pricing:

1. Generally offers significantly lower compute and storage costs than Azure, with flat, transparent pricing in Euros.
2. Pricing includes generous bandwidth and bundled features, with overage charges priced reasonably and options for reserved instances yielding further savings.

7. Oracle Cloud

‍Via Oracle Cloud Infrastructure

If you didn’t know till now, Oracle also provides cloud hosting services.

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is an ideal Azure alternative for teams who rely on Oracle’s databases or enterprise applications.

Oracle has positioned OCI as a price-performance leader (with some truth to it, especially in GPUs and IO-intensive workloads).

Oracle Cloud is also building a reputation in the HPC (high-performance computing) community for its bare-metal GPU clusters and fast networking.

Oracle Cloud Key Features:

1. Provides high‑performance compute instances with up to 128 cores and specialized HPC shapes, including GPU instances with NVIDIA A100 (and H100s coming soon) supported by high‑bandwidth RDMA networking.
2. Offers robust database services with Oracle Autonomous Database in multiple flavors, ideal for enterprise integration and minimal management.
3. Delivers significant network benefits with a free egress allowance (first 10 TB free) and low, flat data transfer fees.
4. Includes an impressive Always Free tier and generous trial credits, allowing free use of small VMs, storage, and databases.
5. Supports multi‑cloud and hybrid environments, with partnerships (e.g., with Microsoft Azure) and VMware deployments for seamless integration.

Oracle Cloud Limitations:

1. Less widely adopted than AWS/Azure, resulting in limited community support and fewer third‑party integrations.
2. Some high‑level AI services remain nascent and the cloud console can be less intuitive.
3. Has fewer global regions, and its enterprise‑focused sales approach may be too aggressive for startups.

Oracle Cloud Pricing:

1. Offers competitive pricing with compute and GPU costs typically 10–20% lower than Azure (e.g., A100 GPU instances around $3.05/hr vs. ~$3.40/hr).
2. Provides steep startup discounts (up to 70% off for two years) and generous free tiers, significantly reducing overall infrastructure costs..

8. Vultr

‍Via Vultr

Vultr is an excellent Azure alternative for those running smaller-scale AI inference tasks on GPUs without the complexity of larger cloud platforms.

Vultr is great for teams on a tight budget who still want decent performance and global reach.

For example, a mobile app startup wanting servers in 5 continents, or an AI startup that occasionally needs a GPU to finetune a model but doesn’t want to navigate Azure’s quota requests.

In summary, choose Vultr when you want an agile, developer-friendly cloud provider that covers the basics (VMs, Kubernetes, storage, GPUs) with minimal hassle and pay-as-you-go affordability.

Vultr Key Features:

1. Global Footprint – Over 20 data center locations across North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and emerging regions ensure low‑latency deployments worldwide.
2. Cloud GPU & Bare Metal Options – Offers on‑demand GPU instances (including NVIDIA A100 and AMD Instinct MI-series) and bare‑metal servers, with fractional GPU options for cost efficiency.
3. Developer-Friendly Platform – Features a clean web console, robust API/CLI, snapshotting, and a managed Kubernetes Engine for seamless provisioning and management.
4. Transparent Pricing & Promotions – Fixed monthly or hourly rates with generous bandwidth allotments and regular promo credits for new users.
5. Additional Services & Independence – Provides essential add‑ons like object storage and managed databases, all backed by a bootstrapped, independent company focused solely on customer needs.

Vultr Limitations:

1. Lacks the extensive range of specialized services (e.g., IoT hubs, advanced analytics) found on major clouds like Azure.
2. Support is primarily ticket‑based and may not offer the same hands‑on assistance as larger enterprise providers.
3. Global compliance certifications and a broader ecosystem are more limited compared to industry giants, potentially affecting regulated environments.

Vultr Pricing:

1. Straightforward pay‑as‑you‑go model with fixed rates (e.g., a 1 CPU, 2GB VM is around $10/month with generous included bandwidth).
2. GPU instances are competitively priced (e.g., fractional A100 starting around $0.43/hour), with promotional credits often available for new users.

Why Is Runpod.io Still a Leading Choice?

Among these diverse alternatives, Runpod.io stands out as a leading choice specifically for AI and ML startups.

Its laser focus on simplifying and supercharging GPU workflows gives it an edge in the machine learning arena.

Unlike general-purpose clouds, Runpod was built from the ground up with AI needs in mind – and it shows in several ways:

RunPod.io offers a comprehensive suite of features tailored to optimize AI and machine learning workflows:​

1. It efficiently manages millions of daily inference requests, providing a serverless infrastructure.
2. The platform supports extended machine learning training tasks, accommodating durations of up to seven days.
3. RunPod.io's serverless GPU workers can dynamically scale from zero to numerous instances across eight or more globally distributed regions.
4. The RunPod.io's supports the deployment of any container within its AI cloud environment. ​
5. Serverless workers have access to network storage volumes backed by NVMe SSDs, offering up to 100 Gbps network throughput.
6. RunPod.io provides a command-line interface too.
7. RunPod.io adheres to stringent compliance and security standards.
8. RunPod.io achieves cold-start times under 250 milliseconds.

Collectively, these features position RunPod.io as a robust and flexible platform for AI practitioners seeking efficient and scalable solutions for their machine learning workloads.​

Interested in trying out? Click here to get started!

‍